Your browser is obsolete!

The page may not load correctly.

Anti-virus fallacies

Антивирусная неправда

Other issues in this category (39)
  • add to favourites
    Add to Bookmarks

Nuclear superpowers fear anti-viruses too

Read: 8159 Comments: 2 Rating: 10

Wednesday, October 4, 2017

When in now distant 1992, Igor Danilov embarked on developing Dr.Web software, he could hardly have imagined an anti-virus being regarded as a threat to some country’s national security. But just 25 years have gone by…

“No department, agency, organization, or other element of the United States Government may use, whether directly or through work with or on behalf of another organization or element of the United States Government, any hardware, software, or services developed or produced, in whole or in part, by Kaspersky Lab.” US officials expressed their concern over Kaspersky Lab's cooperation with Russian special services and that its products could be used for espionage and hacker attacks.

Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH) called Kaspersky Lab's software a threat to America's national security.

http://abcnews.go.com/US/us-senate-mandate-government-wide-ban-russian-firms/story?id=49561147

We won't deny that as far as PCs are concerned, an anti-virus's power in a system is practically unlimited. It can create, delete, and modify any files, and analyse the contents of documents, images, and database files. And this is quite natural because malware can be anywhere.

On the other hand, a faulty anti-virus update can make the operating system freeze by mistakenly deleting a system file or registry entry. But updates for any other application can cause as much harm. ANY. So apprehensions about potential threats coming from updates, including those of an anti-virus, aren't entirely unsubstantiated.

If an anti-virus is a threat, is it possible to be protected from it? In theory, one can demand that its developer validate all virus and anti-spam database updates and preventive protection routines by submitting those to some regulating agency. But updates are released at least once an hour, and they can't be delayed. That’s because a delay may enable a system to be penetrated by brand new malware programs which appear in the thousands on a daily basis. That's why screening anti-virus updates is only possible in theory.

In reality, controlling update sources is the most common way to protect computers from "malicious" updates.

For example:

The communication ministry will develop requirements for identifying software update sources for governmental institutions.

https://delo.ua/tech/internet-provajderam-ogranichat-dostup-k-rabote-s-gosorganami-u-334101

Naturally, if a software program receives its updates from a different jurisdiction and its developers aren't subject to the laws of the countries in which the software is being sold, the possibility exists that the software may contain undocumented features. Not a single example of a malicious update being released for an anti-virus exists in the history of the anti-virus industry! Such an update would mean death for an anti-virus developer. And the death would be instantaneous. No customer would ever excuse such a thing even if it happened unintentionally. By the way, this is one reason why virus analysts and programmers seeking employment, for example, at Doctor Web, are scrutinised as if they were applying for a job in the secret services. All of a candidate’s criminal and hacker connections are traced no matter how far in the past they are (so if you want to work at Doctor Web, don't get involved in shady enterprises).

#anti-virus #myth

The Anti-virus Times recommends

Paranoia is very contagious. It may start with small things, but then it will only snowball. We (as well as others) have seen this before. Surely, the anti-virus industry doesn't benefit from acts of this kind which only undermine security and ultimately place users at the losing end.

[Twitter]

Tell us what you think

To leave a comment, you need to log in under your Doctor Web site account. If you don't have an account yet, you can create one.

Comments